npj Science of Learning

Motor learning is shaped by motivational context: punishment can accelerate initial learning, whereas reward enhances memory retention. Yet it remains unclear whether the dissociable effects of reward and punishment observed in laboratory tasks generalize to complex real-world skills. Here, we tested this idea using a naturalistic motor task--basketball free-throw shooting. Sixty-eight participants trained under four motivational contexts that differed only in how points were awarded for each pair of consecutive shots: control (standard scoring), reward (bonus points for two consecutive successful shots), punishment (penalty for two consecutive missed shots), or mixed (both bonus and penalty). Performance was assessed before training, immediately after, and 1 and 3 days later. Punishment and mixed schedules significantly improved early acquisition, resulting in higher accuracy immediately after training compared to the control and reward conditions. This advantage emerged during the first training block, indicating a rapid motivational influence on performance. In contrast, reward selectively enhanced offline consolidation: three days after training, the reward group showed the largest gains in accuracy, outperforming both the control and punishment groups. The mixed schedule produced quick early gains similar to punishment, but achieved smaller long-term improvements than reward. Consistent with these findings, individual punishment sensitivity was associated with gains in acquisition, while reward sensitivity correlated with offline improvements. Together, these findings demonstrate dissociable effects of motivational valence on the acquisition and consolidation of a complex real-world motor skill. More generally, they position motivational interventions as simple and cost-effective strategies to enhance rehabilitation and sports training.

Studying chess experts helps researchers understand how intensive practice shapes thinking skills. Cognitive flexibility is the ability to adjust thoughts when rules or tasks change. Working memory is the ability to hold and use information over short periods. This study compared cognitive flexibility and working memory precision between adolescent chess players and non-players. Twenty-four professional chess players and twenty-five controls completed two novel behavioral tasks. Chess players showed better accuracy in both tasks than controls. They adapted more efficiently when rules changed during a continuous learning task. They also remembered facial expressions more precisely in a working memory task. Learning rates in the flexibility task did not differ between groups. These results indicate that chess expertise may improve rule-guided flexibility and visual working memory precision in adolescents.

The first year of formal schooling is a year of foundational reading and math learning, and individual differences emerging within this single year predict academic achievement decades later. Yet, how brain changes throughout this critical year relate to individual differences in reading and math learning remains uncharacterized. In this pre-registered study (https://osf.io/97ybe), we acquired monthly both behavioral assessments of reading- and math-learning, and diffusion-weighted MRI scans to measure white matter microstructure, across the first-grade year. Behavioral learning trajectories follow either a sigmoid for reading or an inverted-U for math. Month-to-month microstructural changes in the right middle longitudinal fasciculus predicted corresponding changes in math performance, but not in reading. Findings highlight white matter microstructure as a dynamic substrate of early math learning, and reveal a more general principle: rapid changes in white-matter microstructure during the foundational learning window may be associated with distinct academic domains. Funding: R01 HD114489

High intra-individual reaction time variability (RTV) is traditionally viewed through a deficit perspective and interpreted as a maladaptive signature of attentional lapses, cognitive inefficiency, and systemic noise. However, theories from motor learning and the competitive neurocognitive networks framework suggest that behavioral variability and reduced top-down control might actually facilitate certain forms of implicit skill acquisition. The present study addresses the apparent conflict between these perspectives by investigating whether elevated RTV serves as an adaptive, functional precursor to implicit statistical learning. Across two independent studies, participants completed the Alternating Serial Reaction Time (ASRT) task. We quantified early RTV during the initial task phase using multiple metrics -- coefficient of variation, inter-trial RTV, and ex-Gaussian parameters Sigma and Tau-- to predict subsequent statistical learning. Analyses controlled for baseline response speed and early learning artifacts, and test-retest reliability measures were also evaluated. Our results show that early RTV predicted later statistical learning measured via reaction times. This predictive relationship was most consistent for metrics capturing dynamic, moment-to-moment fluctuations (inter-trial RTV and Sigma) rather than extreme attentional lapses (Tau). While the effect size was relatively small, the association remained significant after controlling for potential statistical confounds. Furthermore, early RTV demonstrated strong test-retest stability. These findings challenge the exclusively deficit-oriented perspective on behavioral noise. Instead, we propose that elevated RTV may reflect an adaptive, exploratory processing tendency, analogous to kinematic exploration in motor learning, that could support the brains ability to implicitly extract and model probabilistic environmental regularities.

Children often outperform adults in probabilistic statistical learning tasks, yet the mechanisms underlying this developmental advantage remain poorly understood. Here, we used eye-tracking measures of belief updating to examine how children and adults acquire and update predictions in a probabilistic sequence-learning task. Using the standard (oculomotor) reaction time measure, children showed stronger statistical learning than adults, replicating previous behavioral findings while revealing a more detailed profile of developmental differences in statistical learning. Critically, children updated their predictions more frequently: they were less likely to repeat previous predictions and more likely to shift their expectations in response to new input. Adults, in contrast, showed greater persistence, tending to maintain prior predictions even when those predictions were inconsistent with the underlying statistical structure. Despite these pronounced differences in updating behavior, the processing and use of prediction errors were remarkably similar across age groups. These findings indicate that developmental differences in statistical learning do not primarily arise from how prediction errors are computed, but rather from how prior beliefs and incoming information are weighted during belief updating. Children's enhanced learning may therefore reflect reduced reliance on stable priors and greater sensitivity to current sensory evidence, supporting a more exploratory learning strategy. Adults, by contrast, appear to favor an exploitative strategy that stabilizes existing predictions but reduces flexibility in probabilistic environments. More broadly, the results suggest that developmental changes in statistical learning may reflect age-related differences in how readily learners revise their predictions in response to incoming evidence. By integrating sensitive oculomotor measures with analyses that probe the mechanisms underlying belief updating, the present study provides a more fine-grained account of how predictive learning changes across development and offers a framework for reconciling previously inconsistent developmental findings in statistical learning.

During explicit sequence learning (ESL), micro-offline gains (MOGS) occur during brief rest periods. MOGS are calculated as the difference in keypresses-per-second (KPS) between the first sequence of one trial and the last sequence of the preceding trial. To date, all studies evaluating MOGS have calculated KPS from the motor execution time (MET) that occurs between keypresses, but this approach ignores potential contributions from motor preparation which occur prior to the first keypress. Given that ESL relies on both pre-movement motor planning and subsequent motor execution, we hypothesized that ignoring motor preparation time (MPT) neglects a critical component of skill acquisition, potentially misrepresenting the true magnitude of MOGS. To test this, we calculated MOGS with and without MPT in thirty adults who performed an ESL task. Our results show that including MPT flipped MOGS from positive to negative and significantly increased the positive correlation between early learning and a gold-standard ESL metric: the number of correct sequences performed. Our results suggest that MPT should be incorporated into MOGS calculations and that excluding it overestimates micro-offline learning.

Contextual word learning is a fundamental mechanism for vocabulary acquisition during childhood. In adults, successful inference of word meaning from context is intrinsically rewarding, and is associated with greater enjoyment and greater activity in reward-related brain regions. Whether similar reward mechanisms support word learning in children, and whether they differ as a function of ability, remains unknown. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine neural responses during contextual word learning in 25 children aged 11-13 years with typical reading skills and in 20 age-matched children with dyslexia. Neurotypical readers showed enhanced activation in core reward-processing regions, including the ventral striatum, when successfully learning the meanings of novel words. In contrast, children with dyslexia did not exhibit comparable reward-related responses despite performing the same task. Crucially, this group difference was specific to word learning, as no significant group differences were observed in ventral striatal responses during a non-linguistic monetary reward task. In addition, to confirm the behavioural relevance of these neural findings, we examined an age-matched, independent sample of children. We found that stronger reading skills were associated with greater enjoyment during successful word learning. Together, these results suggest that interactions between reward and language systems during contextual word learning is influenced by reading proficiency. Reduced intrinsic reward responses to successful language learning may contribute to differences in reading development and have implications for the design of more engaging and effective reading interventions for struggling readers.

Genetic literacy is an integral measure for examining societys interaction with genetics, but widely-used "genetic literacy" measures lack both knowledge comprehension measures and psychometric validation. To address these issues, we validated the Education and Assessment of Genetic Literacy measure (EAGL) in a sample of 2708 US participants, using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In addition to standard subjective and objective knowledge subscales, our measures distinct knowledge comprehension subscale focuses on autism as an example of a complex condition. Regression analyses showed a statistically significant interaction when looking at education and personal connection to autism in relation to knowledge comprehension (F=3.68, p=0.003). Separately, those in our sample with a connection to autism scored higher on the subjective knowledge section (F=19.52, p<0.001) only, concurring with previous demonstrations of a subjective-objective knowledge gap in science literacy. We explored geographic location as one potential factor in genetic literacy and found that metropolitan vs non-metropolitan status had no significant main effects on overall levels. After the validation process, we have two multi-domain measures which accurately capture the construct of genetic literacy and are available for wide use: the multi-faceted EAGL-long, which has previously been tested in thousands of participants, or the validated three-factor EAGL-short.

Cognitive flexibility is the ability to change the way of responding when the demands of the environment change. This study tested how cognitive flexibility develops across the lifespan. We used a new computerized task that gives a continuous score instead of just right or wrong answers. 221 healthy adults aged 18 to 71 completed the Continuous-score Probabilistic Reversal Learning Test (CPRLT). We calculated mean absolute error and adjusted error for rule-based learning, and fitted a Rescorla-Wagner model to estimate each persons learning rate (alpha) for reward-based learning. All three scores have one breakpoint, performance improved rapidly from childhood to young adulthood, then declined slowly. Rule-based learning peaked around age 20. Reward-based learning peaked earlier, around age 18. This suggests that reward-based learning matures before rule-based learning. The pattern fits with brain development: reward circuits mature earlier, while prefrontal regions for rule-based learning develop later. Our continuous measure captured this difference, which binary tasks would miss.

Summary paragraphA hallmark of learning is the need for sensory stimuli (Ginns, 2015; McGraw et al., 2009; Reinwein, 2012; Spence, 1950) so that learning is fundamentally based on sensory input signals affecting behaviour, physiology, and neurology. If behavioural measures of learning can be causally linked to physiological and neurological variables, a broader understanding of the mechanisms related to learning in schools, learning disabilities, and learning and health issues may emerge (McGraw et al., 2009). Despite decades of research on the physiological/neurological variable of sympathetic activation, learning, and achievement (Horvers et al., 2021), any causal relation remains unclear (Cowley et al., 2014; Mason et al., 2020; Pijeira-Diaz et al., 2016; Sung et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2024) and issues with instrument validation remain (Costantini et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2024; Milstein & Gordon, 2020; Van Der Mee et al., 2021). Here we investigate the effect of sensory input on sympathetic activation by using validated instruments for skin conductance measurement (Batista et al., 2019) and whether sympathetic activation is connected to learning in a cognitive laboratory context and an ecologically valid classroom context. In both contexts, we found a physiological variable which correlated with learning and that sensory input affected this variable while student movement did not. These sensory inputs varied depending on the different instructional activities the students participated in. Together, these findings bring us one step closer to a model linking sensory input to behavioural, physiological, and neurological variables.

The ability to store abstract mental representations underlies generalization across virtually every domain of human cognition, from vision and language to concept learning. Yet whether the motor system generates such abstractions and whether they causally contribute to skill learning remain open questions. Here, we introduce a paradigm in which human participants learned to refine novel movement patterns by learning to precisely copy unfamiliar handwritten characters. To examine the role of motor abstractions in this form of motor learning, participants were trained on markedly rotated versions of the characters, which recruited vastly different muscle commands while still maintaining the relevant abstract movement trajectory. Across eight experiments, abstraction training drove robust skill improvements that were comparable to having repetitive practice on the canonical form of each novel character. Moreover, this learning was motoric in nature: it required neither visual feedback nor visual mental imagery and was sensitive to the sequential structure of the abstract movement trajectory. These findings establish a causal role for abstract representations in motor learning, revealing that the motor system likely deploys abstractions in the earliest stages of skill acquisition.

Goal-directed behavior often requires sustained effort across a sequence of interdependent decisions, yet the determinants of persistence in such contexts remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated how individuals regulate persistence in a novel sequential effort-based task in which they controlled an avatar through successive checkpoints to reach a final goal and could make repeated attempts following failure. At each attempt, participants could choose either to persist in the same task or to disengage toward an easier but less rewarding alternative. We found that decisions to persist or disengage were jointly shaped by multiple interacting factors. Disengagement increased with task difficulty and lower skill level. It also increased with repeated attempts and time-on-task, indexing fatigue, and with accumulated errors, indexing lack of progress. Conversely, proximity to the goal promoted persistence and shaped decision dynamics by reducing choice conflict during persistence decisions and increasing hesitation during disengagement near the goal. Notably, clearing the first checkpoint produced a sharp increase in persistence, suggesting that early success plays a pivotal role. Furthermore, persistence reflected both retrospective and prospective evaluations of effort, with prior investment promoting commitment and anticipated effort reducing it. Finally, disengagement was preceded by short-term performance decline but not by gradual increases in decision conflict, suggesting relatively abrupt strategy shifts following repeated failures. Together, these findings provide a comprehensive account of persistence in sequential effortful tasks, showing that decisions to persist or disengage are jointly shaped by multiple factors related to fatigue, (lack of) progress, goal proximity, and early success.

Response inhibition, the ability to suppress contextually inappropriate actions, is a cornerstone of cognitive control and is commonly assessed using paradigms such as the go/no-go task. However, traditional go/no-go paradigms rely on binary outcomes such as commission errors, which offer limited insight into the dynamic, graded behavioral adjustments underlying successful stopping. The present study developed a novel mouse-tracking go/no-go paradigm with a dynamic start to capture inhibitory processes during ongoing execution. Twenty-three healthy young adults completed the task in two sessions separated by approximately one week to evaluate the test-retest reliability of standard behavioral measures (error rates and reaction times), and three kinematic features: path length, mean velocity, and mean acceleration. Results revealed robust differences between go and no-go trials across all measures. Successful inhibition was characterized by significantly shorter path lengths and reduced mean velocity and acceleration compared to go trials. Critically, all measures demonstrated moderate-to-good test-retest reliability across sessions, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from .75 to .85 for go trials and from .59 to .83 for no-go trials. These findings establish construct validity and psychometric reliability of the current mouse-tracking go/no-go paradigm. The demonstrated stability of these measures provides the methodological foundation for their use in cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention research targeting inhibitory control.

Formal writing is evolutionarily recent, yet the brains of literate adults contain regions - the OTS-words subregions - that respond more strongly to written text than other stimuli. We tested a novel solution to this multi-disciplinary paradox: Does symbolic language processing, which emerged early in human history, lay the neural foundation for reading? In a longitudinal fMRI study, we followed 17 children through their first year of literacy training and related neural responses to text, symbolic language processing, and emerging reading skills over time. We found that middle OTS-words is engaged in symbolic language processing before children learn to read, and that this early engagement predicts later text selectivity and reading ability. These findings suggest that literacy builds on a pre-existing neural scaffold linking vision and language.

Humans possess an astounding ability to acquire complex movement sequences with limited practice. Motor sequence learning engages a distributed network of brain regions that show distinct learning-related changes: the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is predominantly involved early in learning, whereas the primary motor cortex (M1) becomes increasingly engaged later in learning. Because motor regions mature relatively earlier than the PFC during development, we examined how children and adults differ in the time course of neural changes underlying motor sequence learning. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we compared brain activation in children (7-10 years, N = 39, 17 female) and adults (20-32 years, N = 39, 19 female) during an associative visuomotor learning task. In both age groups, response times decreased with sequence repetition, with greater reductions in adults than in children. Across age groups, early learning was associated with heightened PFC activation, whereas later learning was characterized by increased activation in left M1 and bilateral supplementary motor area. Children and adults showed comparable decreases in PFC activation and PFC-M1 connectivity with sequence repetition. In contrast, adults exhibited larger learning-related increases in activation and stability of multivariate patterns in left M1. Together, these findings indicate that although both age groups engage the PFC similarly to support increased control demands in early learning, children show less pronounced modulation of M1 activation and representational similarity, suggesting that M1s capacity to form stable, sequence-related representations may still be developing in middle childhood. Significance StatementAlthough motor sequence learning has been widely studied in adults, less is known about how brain activation changes as learning progresses during childhood. This question is particularly relevant because prefrontal cortex (PFC) and primary motor cortex (M1) both support motor learning, but mature at different rates, with PFC developing relatively later than M1. Here, we used functional MRI to compare children (7-10 years) and adults performing a motor sequence learning task. We found no age-related differences in PFC engagement early in learning; instead children showed less refinement of M1 activation and neural representations over the course of learning than adults. These findings provide new insight into how the brain supports motor learning throughout development.

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) can expand undergraduates access to research and motivate students to stay in science. Yet, little research has examined how CURE instruction shapes student motivation. We leveraged a motivation-related characterization of non-content talk of 48 CURE and non-CURE instructors to predict the motivation-related outcomes of 462 students. We fit a series of multi-level models (MLM) in which we regressed students post-course scientific self-efficacy, task values, scientific identity, and science-related intentions onto instructors self-efficacy and task values-related talk, controlling for students pre-course levels. We also fit an MLM to explore whether instructors relationship-building talk (immediacy talk) was associated with students rapport with their instructor. Instructors self-efficacy talk did not affect students self-efficacy, and instructors immediacy talk had a marginally positive but non-significant association with students rapport ratings. Instructors task values talk positively influenced students scientific identity and some but not all of their task values. Instructors task values talk also positively influenced students intentions to pursue a science career, but not graduate education or research careers. Collectively, these results suggest that instructors task values talk may underpin some of the motivational effects of CURE instruction, but that task values talk need not be limited to CUREs. HIGHLIGHTWe examine whether instructor talk predicts students motivational outcomes in CURE and non-CURE lab courses. Self-efficacy talk had no effect on student self-efficacy. Task values talk positively affected students science identity and career intentions, and some value beliefs. Immediacy talk was marginally related to student-instructor rapport.

Understanding speech in noisy environments (SPIN) is an important everyday ability, and engaging in musical activities has been proposed as a factor that may support this ability. However, the cognitive mechanisms underlying a potential musical advantage in SPIN perception remain unclear. Here we investigated whether musical sophistication is associated with better SPIN perception in a large population-based sample, and whether this relationship is mediated by auditory working memory (AWM), verbal working memory (VWM), or non-verbal intelligence. We recruited 203 participants and measured SPIN perception at both word and sentence levels. Musical sophistication was assessed using the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI). AWM was measured using delayed matching of tone frequency or the modulation rate of amplitude modulated white noise, VWM was based on backward digit span task, and non-verbal intelligence used matrix reasoning. Mediation analyses revealed that AWM fully mediated the relationship between musical sophistication and SPIN perception, whereas VWM showed no mediation effect. Non-verbal intelligence showed a partial mediating effect. Additional control analyses using structural equation modelling revealed that the indirect effect through AWM remained significant after accounting for age, hearing thresholds, and non-verbal intelligence. Together, these findings suggest that individuals with greater musical sophistication demonstrate better daily life listening abilities, and that superior auditory working memory may be the key cognitive mechanism underlying this advantage.

It has been proposed that bilinguals have better executive function (EF) arising from the constant selection of one language while inhibiting the other, and gray matter has been found to differ in bilinguals in regions linked to EF (frontal-parietal and subcortical structures). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is associated with poorer EF and neuroanatomical differences underlying EF. Given the EF advantage in bilinguals, we investigated whether a bilingual experience affects EF performance and brain structure differentially in those with ADHD. Using the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study, we compared early Spanish-English bilinguals and English-speaking monolinguals with and without ADHD. ANOVAs for the Flanker, Working Memory, and Card Sort Tasks revealed no main effects of Language Experience (Bilingual versus Monolingual), a main effect of Diagnostic Group for Card Sort (ADHD worse than Controls), and no interaction effects on performance for any task. ANOVAs for gray matter volume (GMV) revealed a main effect of Language Experience in many regions, a main effect of Diagnostic Group in some regions, but no interactions. GMV in left thalamus was affected by both ADHD and bilingualism, but the effect of ADHD was not significantly diminished or enhanced by the dual-language experience. For cortical thickness, there was a main effect of Language Experience in several regions, no main effect of Diagnostic Group, and no interactions. Taken together, bilingualism has some impact on EF performance, a strong impact on neuroanatomy, but there was no disproportionate impact by bilingualism on the differences caused by ADHD for any measure. Research HighlightsExecutive function and brain structure differ in ADHD and in bilinguals, prompting the need to investigate interactive effects. Bilingualism did not disproportionately affect performance differences in ADHD for executive function, nor for gray matter volume or for cortical thickness differences in ADHD. Gray matter volume was less in ADHD than non-ADHD, as well as greater in bilinguals than monolinguals in the left thalamus, but without interaction effect. These independent effects indicate that the brain basis of ADHD is not impacted by a dual-language experience.

Learning in adulthood is embedded in everyday social life, in which periods of psychosocial stress alternate with recovery. The autonomic nervous system regulates how the body responds to environmental demands, yet individuals differ markedly in this regulation. It remains unknown whether such individual differences in bodily regulation modulate the ability to learn probabilistic patterns from sensory input. Here, we investigated statistical learning of probabilistic patterns in speech streams in a six-hour experiment incorporating psychosocial stress and recovery to approximate everyday conditions. Sixty-five adults were exposed to novel speech streams in high- and low-stress contexts, with learning assessed immediately after exposure and following a rest period. Heart rate variability was recorded throughout the experiment to capture individual differences in autonomic reactivity to stress and recovery. From these measures, we constructed composite proxies of sympathetic (SNS) and parasympathetic (PNS) nervous system reactivity. Individuals with congruent SNS-PNS reactivity--either jointly high or jointly low--showed superior statistical learning outcomes across stress contexts. SNS reactivity preferentially supported encoding, whereas PNS reactivity supported consolidation. Moreover, the effect of SNS activation during speech exposure on statistical learning depended on individuals SNS reactivity profiles. These findings demonstrate that individual differences in bodily regulation are tightly linked to the ability to learn statistical dependencies in stressful environments. Overall, the findings highlight the essential role of brain-body-environment interactions in statistical learning.

The perception of time is elastic, often deviating from physical intervals depending on how experience is structured. Yet, what determines how subjective time is constructed remains debated. Here, we tested whether perceived ongoing time is actively constructed from learned event representations rather than a dedicated internal clock. Using a novel pause-adjustment task across three statistical learning experiments, we measured temporal distortions during continuous listening to structured versus unstructured syllable streams. The presence of event structure systematically warped time: pauses were perceived as longer between pseudowords and shorter within pseudowords. This bidirectional temporal warping emerged online and remained stable across pause durations. Enriching these events with semantic meaning eliminated boundary-related dilation while preserving within-event compression. Moreover, physiological tracking of event structure, indexed by pupil dynamics, dissociated from the magnitude of temporal warping. These findings show that subjective time is constructed from hierarchical event representations and depends not only on where events are segmented, but also on how they are represented.